Kim Kardashian Unrecognizable Black Face Add-on: She's endured a lot of controversy over the years, from her 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries to the scandal over her "Kimono" sash line and the violent reaction over her ad. Instagram for appetite suppressant lollipops.

And now Kim Kardashian is being criticized online for a new magazine cover, where fans accuse her of "black face" in the image.

The snapshot shows the 39-year-old "Keeping Up With The Kardashians" lying on a white bed, dressed in a trimmed Mugler black dress, a luxurious Amwaj Jewelery necklace, and a black wig.

However, people were not impressed with the campaign, and one person called it "problematic and racially insensitive."

Kim Kardashian Unrecognizable Black Face Add-on

"Really, Kim Kardashian, this is becoming too much. We know perfectly well that they all want to be black, but this is not the way. While this is a beautiful photo, you are fishing black," someone else said on Instagram.

Others called her the "black fishing queen," while another said, "You're not black, for."

"Blackfishing" is a practice in which white women appear to be black.

The urban dictionary defines black fishing as "commonly perpetrated by women of European (white) descent, which involves artificial tanning (spray tanning booths and tanning booths), and using makeup to manipulate facial features by seem to have some kind of black African ancestry. "

Since the spotlight reaction, a source close to Kim, who was on the set at the time of the shoot, has revealed to Page Six that the lighting has made her look darker. the picture.

"There are several covers and images of this session where the lighting is more natural. People are quick to find the negative in everything and often also forget that she is of Armenian descent," source.

GOP dismissal vote to be 'modern-day GOP' funeral, says former DNC chief

On the House floor, the accusation is almost certain, with a sizeable Democratic majority in the chamber ensuring that both articles against President Trump, abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, will be supported. However, the markedly partisan nature of the vote has forced Democrats to explain why Republicans are not expected to vote in favor of ousting.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat, the former chair of the National Democratic Committee, says Republicans have "chosen power over the principle."

He has lamented how strongly Republicans protect the president. For the most part, they have strongly argued that there was nothing wrong with Trump's pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce politically motivated investigations, including on the DNC.

However, despite the Republican Party publicly condemning the political trial, Wasserman Schultz says "there are a lot of Republicans talking behind their hands and whispering to us that they know what he did was wrong."

She has her own idea as to why these members are not talking.

"They are petrified of being defeated in a Republican primary," suggested Wasserman Schultz. She thought that if the political judgment vote were to take place after the deadline to run as main candidate, some Republicans could vote with the Democrats. As things stood, Republicans are not expected to desert.

Wasserman Schultz described this refusal to oppose Trump as the "funeral of the modern Republican party."

Democrats were, for the most part, shady but determined in their behavior.

Rep. A Green, a Texas Democrat, filed a political judgment ruling against Trump in 2017, becoming the first member of Congress to do so. However, he was barely happy on Wednesday, even when his sentence was only hours away.

Aware that a Republican-controlled Senate trial was intended to acquit Trump, he compared the political trial to Damocles' sword, which would continue to hang on President, even if he evaded the dire consequences of his blow, that is. , dismissal of the post. - As a result of the pressure campaign of Ukraine.

"We've all been vindicated," Green told Yahoo News. "It's not about whether you like the president; it's about whether you love your country."

Vegan couple fed children only with raw fruits and vegetables charged with murder after starving baby

A vegan couple who fed their children only with raw fruits and vegetables were charged with murder after their son was allegedly starved.

Florida couple Ryan Patrick O'Leary, 30, and Sheila O'Leary, 35, told police they only fed their children a diet of raw fruits and vegetables. On Wednesday, a Lee County Grand Jury indicted the couple.

They are charged with first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter, child abuse and two counts of child negligence after his 18-month-old son died of starvation, according to authorities.

According to a Cape Coral police report, the boy weighed only 17 pounds (8 kilograms), which experts say is in line with what a seven-month-old boy should weigh.

Her mother called 911 in September when she noticed her son was not breathing and was cold. She tried to resurrect the baby, but he was dead when paramedics arrived, according to News-Press.

State Attorney Amira Fox said the indictment includes three other children who also suffered child abuse and extreme neglect. They are three, five and 11 years old.

Allegedly, these children were also malnourished and one had to have some teeth removed, according to WBBH.

Ms. Fox added: "The evidence and scene of the crime in this case is poignant. These are images as a mother and State Attorney that I will not be able to forget."

The couple will appear in court Monday and will remain in prison. According to WBBH, they could face the death penalty if found guilty.

In November, parents were charged with aggravated manslaughter, but charges were enhanced after the grand jury indicted.

Ryan O'Leary is the biological father of the three youngest children and the 11-year-old is currently in Virginia with his paternal father.